It comes as no surprise to me that a rise in book banning correlates to loss of literacy and reading skills. We can expect the hand wringing to continue as states pass laws and create policies that limit access to books and other media.
According to PEN America there were 6870 book bans in the United States during the 2024-25 school year. Ninety-two percent of the challenges came from organized groups, or from the government. One of the reasons that the number of challenges has gone up exponentially in the last five years is that groups such as Moms for Liberty are challenging entire categories of books, whereas before 2020 most challenges came from individual parents concerned about what their own child was reading.
Following is a partial list of what states are doing (or not) to protect our right to read. Be aware that in every state and territory in the US there are people and organizations fighting for everyone's right to read and access information, just as there are people and organizations in every state working to restrict access.
Alabama's ban on LGBTQ and "sexually explicit" books in youth sections of public libraries has resulted in the loss of funding for at least one library which refused to move children's books into the adult section of the library.
Arkansas is enforcing a vague book banning law that calls for criminal penalites for educators, librarians, booksellers, and potentially individual citizens, who provide materials that are deemed "harmful" to minors. The law does not specify or define which books are harmful.
Florida leads the country in number of book bans and continues to search for ways to keep its lead. Recently the Commissioner or Education told educators to "weed on purpose" to look for and remove any books that might be controversial.
Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry recently introduced an online form to facilitate Louisianans' ability to turn in librarians and other educators who make available LGBTQ content, under the guise of "protecting minors".
Massachusetts Governor Maura Healy signed the Freedom to Read Act in August ensuring access to diverse stories and viewpoints in schools and libraries throughout the Commonwealth. States that have similar laws include Rhode Island, New Jersey, New York, Illinois, Maryland, California, Delaware, Colorado, and Oregon.
Michigan The State Library Association and the ACLU have partnered to create a digital Hostile Territory Map "document[ing] book challenges and other government actions affecting First Amendment...rights in Michigan schools and public libraries".
Missouri ACLU successfully argued to block a vague book banning law that would have put teachers, librarians, and potentially even citizens at risk of being arrested for providing "harmful" materials to minors.
New York Brooklyn Public Library created Books Unbanned which provides free e-cards to teens and young adults anywhere in the country so they can access BPL's digital collection.
Ohio As school vouchers fund more private schools, public school libraries in Ohio are looking at funding cuts that could eliminate some school libraries completely.
Tennessee Rutherford County Library System is facing a wrongful termination lawsuit for firing their Library Director who refused to move 132 children's books to the adult section of the library.
Texas Lt. Governor Dan Patrick's call to remove over 2,000 titles of "dirty, filthy and vulgar books" from school libraries included two holocaust memoirs Night by Elie Wiesel and The Diary of Anne Frank among other books about the holocaust as well as books by and about marginalized communities including the LGBTQ community. He has since walked back the call to remove books about the holocaust, but otherwise plans to 'come for the books'.
Utah A state law calls for removal of any book that has been challenged in at least three public school districts. Since the start of the school year eight titles have been banned statewide for a total of forty-four banned books.
When I talk about book banning and censorship to groups I tell them not to concern themselves with whether or not their local library has books that offend them. It does. Rather, I suggest that they check to see if the library has materials that support their interests and viewpoints. Just as libraries should have something to offend everyone, they should also have something that appeals to everyone. I also try to make clear that while the current crisis in book banning is driven by the right, the left can take their part of the blame as well. I hear the same language used on both sides and the same tactics. Books can be "harmful" and we must protect children from them. Reading passages out of context is another game both sides will play.
The chilling effects of censorship can be seen from both sides as well. Self censorship on the part of authors who will not write books that might be offensive to someone, publishers that will not publish books that they don't believe will sell, libraries that will not purchase them, and booksellers that will not carry them means that everyone loses.
People should be trusted to make their own reading choices. The Freedom to Read Statement, adopted by the ALA in 1953 is just as essential today as it was then.
I recommend following BookRiot, PEN America, The Freedom to Read Project, Everylibrary, and the American Library Association to keep abreast of book bans and challenges, along with other book and library related news.